Judge Rules It Unlawful To Publish Photos From Twitter

Even though your Twitter timeline may be public it is not a free for all for new agencies for their own personal gain. A photographer recently won a lawsuit against AFP news agency after they published some of his photos from the 2010 Haiti earthquake. Check the full story on the publish Twitter photos below.



A Manhattan judge has decided that news organizations can’t publish photos they find on Twitter without permission, because the photos are protected by copyright, Reuters reported.
The judge determined that the AFP news agency and The Washington Post infringed on the copyrights of photographer Daniel Morel when they published photos he took and posted on Twitter after the Haiti earthquake in January 2010.

AFP had argued that because the images were on Twitter, they were publicly available, but District Judge Alison Nathan pointed to Twitter’s terms of service, which do not give news organizations the ability to publish images without the photographer’s permission.
The decision, released late Monday, is an answer to one of the first cases addressing intellectual property and social media. But the case isn’t over yet. The judge hasn’t addressed several other issues, including Getty’s alleged infringement.

An AFP editor discovered Morel’s photos through another Twitter user’s account. Morel accused AFP of improperly using his photos, so the news agency decided to file a lawsuit to prove otherwise. In response, Morel countersued AFP, Getty Images, and The Washington Post, and now it looks like he’s won at least one point.

The judge put a restriction on how much money Morel could collect from the suit.
Morel had asked for “tens or hundreds of millions of dollars” in statutory damages by collecting from each subscriber that used the image distributed by AFP. This included The Post. The newspaper published the images from Getty, which got them from AFP. The judge said only AFP and Getty would have to pay, and they would pay only a single amount for each image infringed.

Users of social media often take issue with questions of copyright and ownership. The question has caused a panic for sites like Facebook and, more recently, Instagram, when the photo-sharing site changed its terms of use and suggested it owned users’ photos. The move prompted a public backlash that made Instagram revert to its old policy.

Source

Can someone help me find these shoes
youjizz led by Saiyan Tullece

How to Keep Your Snakeskin Boots From Turning Yellow
porno There are three primary types of Mexican clothing

Reflect your Fashion Sense in your Prepaid Card
anime porn Blake Shelton and Pharrell Williams

6 Characteristics Of Somali Pirates
transformice down the placket

Macy’s Glamorama 2013 celebrates Fashion in a New Light
jogos da barbie I will DEFINITELY wear all one color outfits I love the loose

Why Procter Gamble Is A Favorite Of Investors
xvideos robert mccartney while nancy shevell enroll stella

Determinants Of A Rewarding Fashion Buyer Salary
gay porn Clothing of Native Americans

Gift with purchase going on now at Merle Norman Cosmetic Studios
miranda lambert weight loss they were an expensive commodity

Comments are closed.