Instagram Hit With Its First Ever Class Action Lawsuit

Facebook is no stranger to the courtroom. Mark Zuckerburg and Co. has hashed out a couple legal disputes over the years. Well hopefully their lawyers did not go on vacation for the holiday season because one of the social networks biggest and best acquisitions Instagram was recently hit with its first class action lawsuit. After modifying it terms of service recently, basically like Facebook’s, users raged about the changes. One user however dislikes the new terms so bad she is suing the photo sharing network.

Facebook’s Instagram photo sharing service has been hit with what appears to be the first civil lawsuit to result from changed service terms that prompted howls of protest last week.

In a proposed class action lawsuit filed in San Francisco federal court on Friday, a California Instagram user leveled breach of contract and other claims against the company.

“We believe this complaint is without merit and we will fight it vigorously,” Facebook spokesman Andrew Noyes said in an e-mail.

Instagram, which allows people to add filters and effects to photos and share them easily on the Internet, was acquired by Facebook earlier this year for $715 million.

In announcing revised terms of service last week, Instagram spurred suspicions that it would sell user photos without compensation. It also announced a mandatory arbitration clause, forcing users to waive their rights to participate in a class action lawsuit except under very limited circumstances.

The current terms of service, in effect through mid-January, contain no such liability shield.

The backlash prompted Instagram founder and CEO Kevin Systrom to retreat partially a few days later, deleting language about displaying photos without compensation.

However, Instagram kept language that gave it the ability to place ads in conjunction with user content, and saying “that we may not always identify paid services, sponsored content, or commercial communications as such.” It also kept the mandatory arbitration clause.

The lawsuit, filed by San Diego-based law firm Finkelstein & Krinsk, says customers who do not agree with Instagram’s terms can cancel their profile but then forfeit rights to photos they had previously shared on the service.

“In short, Instagram declares that ‘possession is nine-tenths of the law and if you don’t like it, you can’t stop us,’” the lawsuit says.

Kurt Opsahl, a senior staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation who had criticized Instagram, said he was pleased that the company rolled back some of the advertising terms and agreed to better explain their plans in the future.

However, he said the new terms no longer contain language which had explicitly promised that private photos would remain private. Facebook had engendered criticism in the past, Opsahl said, for changing settings so that the ability to keep some information private was no longer available.

“Hopefully, Instagram will learn from that experience and refrain from removing privacy settings,” Opsahl said.

The civil lawsuit in U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, is Lucy Funes, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated vs. Instagram Inc., 12-cv-6482.


10 Hottest Shoes From Emily B
xhamster While in New York for Fashion Week

That Interesting Business Tool We Call a Newsletter
jogos de vestir That’s why

How to Purchase the Right Diamond Ring
kinox -4-free is an organization supporting breast cancer research

Fair in Love Wardrobe is a must read
movie2k I am saying that no matter how magical Mr

Glamour’s interactive fashion week pop up
youporn The also saw the rise of fashion fads

Best Dress Up Games For Girls Who Love Fashion
youjizz fashion tips for so few most men past 18

Top Spring Fashion Tips When You Are On A Lean Budget
quick weight loss symphony or in a stage presentation like classical theatres

Is the Real Estate Boom All Sizzle
weight loss tips Success in the fashion industry is dependent upon talent

Comments are closed.